Monday, May 16, 2011

Day 247, May 18th, 2011

Enclosed you'll find my May 12, 2011 OpEd.


Follow me @YoramEttinger http://twitter.com/YoramEttinger

You may disseminate and post on Facebook and other networks.

Speaking engagements may be scheduled per list of topics on my website

(http://www.theettingerreport.com(.

Have a pleasant weekend,

Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger "Second Thought: US-Israel Initiative,"

Jerusalem, Israel



Israel's Public Diplomacy: it's the Moral High Ground, Pal!

Yoram Ettinger, "Second Thought: US-Israel Initiative"

YnetNews, May 12, 2011

http://bit.ly/mkmOXD



Secretaries of State, Schultz and Baker did not agree with Prime Minister

Shamir's worldview, but they respected his principle-driven tenacity. Upon

concluding a meeting with then Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, George

Mitchell and Bob Dole, the latter told Shamir: "Irrespective of our

disagreement with your policy, we respect you, because you're tough."



The international arena does not respect Israeli prime ministers who seek

popularity rather than respect, transforming Red Lines to Pink Lines, in

order to avoid confrontation. The world does not appreciate prime ministers

who subordinate long-term vision and conviction to short-term diplomatic and

political convenience.



In contrast to the legacy of Prime Ministers Ben Gurion, Eshkol, Golda Meir,

Begin and Shamir, Israel's current public diplomacy reflects frail

conviction, while expressing empathy for claims made by Israel's enemies. It

tolerates simplistic Western assumptions about the Arab-Israeli conflict and

downplays Israel's contribution to the national security of the USA. Israel

has hardly leveraged the current Arab turmoil that underscores the

tenuous/violent nature of Israel's enemies and the inherent obstacles to

intra-Arab peace (let alone to Israel-Arab peace). Israel has failed to

emphasize the uniquely high threshold of security requirements of the Jewish

State in the most dangerous neighborhood in the world and the special role

played by Israel as an outpost of Western democracies and a sole beacon of

democracy.



In contrast with the Arabs who highlight their "rights," Israel highlights

security-requirements, while minimizing well-documented and unique ancient

roots. While Israeli leaders pride themselves on their "pragmatism" and

willingness to distance themselves from historical roots, they, in fact,

undermine Israel's global legitimacy. The Jewish State ignores the lesson of

King Solomon's Trial: He who agrees "to split the difference" forfeits his

rights to everything.



Since 1993, the Jewish State has downplayed its moral high ground, embracing

moral-equivalence. Therefore, it has legitimized the Palestinian Authority

as a supposed partner for peace negotiations, despite Abu Mazen's track

record: establishing Palestinian hate-education, Holocaust denial,

coordinating PLO relations with ruthless Communist regimes, co-planning of

the Munich Massacre, perpetrating subversion in Egypt, Syria, Jordan and

Lebanon and collaborating with Saddam's invasion of Kuwait. Moreover,

Israel has adopted the "Land-for-Peace" state of mind, in spite of the fact

that the conflict has always been over the existence - and not the size - of

the Jewish State. Since 1993, land conceded to the Palestinian Authority

has been transformed into a platform of hate education and terrorism,

fueling the conflict.



The current seismic events in the Arab World beg for an Israeli public

diplomacy offensive. Such events should remove the "Middle East Screen

Saver," exposing the region as the role model of instability,

ethnic-religious-tribal-geographic fragmentation, terrorism, violence as a

norm of settling political disputes, hate culture, one-man one-revolution

regimes, tenuous regimes-accords-alliances, treachery, volatility,

unpredictability and uncertainty. The deeper the uncertainty and the

violence, the higher the Israeli security requirements, the more critical

become the mountain ridges of Judea and Samaria, the Golan Heights of

Jerusalem and of the 15 miles wide pre-1967 Israel. Israel stands out as the

only stable, reliable, capable, democratic and unconditional ally of the

USA.



The intra-Arab upheaval also removes the "Palestinian Screen Saver,"

revealing the Middle East order of priorities. Hence, the Palestinian issue

is not the root cause of regional turbulence, not the crown-jewel of Arab

policy-making, not the core cause of anti-Western Islamic terrorism and not

the crux of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Regardless, Israel persists in

subordinating its vision, policy, security requirements and public diplomacy

to simplistic misperceptions, which are resoundingly refuted on the Arab

Street in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Oman, Bahrain, Syria, etc.



But, like a deer caught in a headlights-look, Israel is glued to the

"Palestinian Screen Saver." On the other hand, Arab leaders shower

Palestinians with rhetoric but not with resources. They do not shed blood on

behalf of the Palestinian issue. Furthermore, they consider the Palestinians

a subversive element, based on PLO violence in Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon

and Kuwait. What do Arabs know about the PLO that Israel refuses to share

with the world?!



Israel has refrained from presenting the threat posed - to vital American

and Western interests - by the proposed Palestinian state: death sentence to

the pro-US Hashemite regime; a tailwind to anti-US terrorism in Iraq and

throughout the region; enhanced access by Russia, China, North Korea, and

possibly Iran, to the eastern flank of the Mediterranean; rewarding a regime

which drives Christians out of Bethlehem; an additional anti-US vote at the

UN, and an added fuel to the Middle East inferno.



The late General Alexander Haig, who was the Supreme Commander of NATO and

US Secretary of State defined Israel as "the largest American aircraft

carrier, which does not require a single US soldier, cannot be sunk, most

cost-effective and battle-tested, deployed in a critical area for vital US

economic and national security interests, sparing the US $20BN annually,

which would be required to deploy real aircraft carriers."



Will Israel's public diplomacy leverage the aforementioned significant data,

shifting to a determined, lucid, defiant, politically-incorrect and

principle-driven tactic, or will it persist in its hesitant, ambiguous,

popularity-driven and apologetic tactic, which intensifies pressure and

threats, undermines security, distances itself from peace and brings war

closer?







No comments:

Post a Comment