THE WHITE HOUSE DENIES JERUSALEM IS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL
In an unannounced move last week, the controllers of the White House website quietly removed any link between Jerusalem and Israel. Apparently Jerusalem is now located in some other country but they don't say which one. Or perhaps it's now a country in its own right. Whatever it is, any claim to it being in Israel - far less the capital of Israel - has been removed.
This decision to expunge Israel was exposed by Rick Richman in an article in The New York Sun on August 10th (see below).
Did President Obama know about this in advance of it happening? Was this done with his approval? Is this part of his plan to put pressure on Israel to accede to his demands and hand back territory in return for nothing?
One of our colleagues received an email from Roz Rothstein of StandWithUs urging people to contact the White House to let them know how they feel and demand that they reinstate immediately the data that identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and we're please do what we can to help by spreading the word and urging people to act accordingly. It will only take a couple of minutes. The email address is www.whitehouse.gov/contact and Roz has even given her email as a guide to what to say, to help make life easier (see below). Worst case scenario, just copy it and send it.
But it is absolutely essential that we protest loud and hard about this unwarranted act of denial and that we urge all our contacts worldwide to do the same. Otherwise, it will become the 'conventional wisdom' that Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel which plays into the hands of those who seek to destroy Israel. And we don't want that, do we?
Charles Munro
Director
MIDDLE EAST EDUCATION TRUST
Please send this message (or similar) to the White House and to everyone you know. If you are active in other organizations, please share with them. Thank you in advance. Please take three minutes and let the White House know how you feel about them DENYING that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel! Here is what I wrote at e-mail at: www.whitehouse.gov/contact - under the foreign policy category. It's EASY.
DO NOT DENY THAT JERUSALEM IS AND HAS BEEN THE CAPITAL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND OF ISRAEL.
I am horrified that the White House website has scrubbed the links that locate Jerusalem in Israel.
Jerusalem has been universally recognized as the spiritual and temporal capital of the Jewish people for over 3,000 years, as documented in history and religious books and through archaeological evidence.
The Jewish people once again became the majority population in Jerusalem over 150 years ago. And when Israel reunited the city in 1967, it became the first government to protect the rights and holy sites of all faiths in Jerusalem.
DO NOT REWRITE HISTORY.
Do not hold Jerusalem hostage to current shallow political maneuvers.
Do not pretend that others have equal claim to the ancestral city of the Jewish people.
I URGE you to immediately restore the data that correctly identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
WHITE HOUSE, IN ESCALATION OF JERUSALEM CONTROVERSY,
SCRUBS ITS WEBSITE OF REFERENCES TO THE CITY BEING IN ISRAEL
The New York Sun
By, Rick Richman
August 10, 2011
The White House, in an escalation of a closely-watched case the Supreme Court is preparing to hear on whether Congress or the President gets to decide American policy in respect of passports of American citizens born in Jerusalem, has quietly altered its website to remove the references to Jerusalem being in "Israel."
The references to Jerusalem had appeared in the cut-lines of photographs on the White House website illustrating an account of the Vice President's trip to Jerusalem last year. The references to "Jerusalem, Israel' were first disclosed in The New York Sun's dispatch last week on Zivotofsky v. Clinton. The case asks the high court to rule on the constitutionality of the 2002 law that gives American citizens born in Jerusalem the right to have "Israel" entered on their passports as their place of birth.
The Sun's report was titled "Jerusalem Case at Supreme Court May Pit White House Web Site Against the President," and noted that the pictures might be pivotal evidence contradicting the administration's claim that the 2002 law impermissibly infringes the President's power to "recognize foreign sovereigns." Since the White House had effectively acknowledged on its own website that Jerusalem is in Israel - as have other executive branch agencies - the report suggested there might not really be a constitutional issue in giving Zivotofsky a statutory right to have that fact noted on his passport.
Yesterday afternoon Daniel Halper of The Weekly Standard posted one of the pictures, noting the reference to "Jerusalem, Israel" and contrasting it with the State Department press release issued earlier in the day stating the current administration policy to prohibit U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem from having "Israel" designated in their passports. The Halper posting went up at at 3:22 p.m. Less than three hours later, at 5:36 p.m. Halper noted that, at some time after he posted the picture, the White House had "apparently gone through its website, cleansing any reference to Jerusalem as being in Israel, including the pictures of Biden there last year."
Throughout the past year-and-a-half that the pictures have been on the website, no one thought the captions affected the president's constitutional powers, but rather simply noted the fact that Jerusalem is Israel's capital. It may be the subject of future final status negotiations, if final status negotiations ever resume. But currently it is within Israel, and in particular no one expects control of West Jerusalem, where Master Zivotofsky was born, ever to change.
This point is given considerable support by the amicus brief filed last Friday by Members of the U.S. Senate and House, including majority leader Sen. Harry Reid and 27 other senators from both parties, together with a bipartisan group of 11 House members, including the chair and ranking members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The amicus brief argues that the Constitution unambiguously places ultimate control over passports in Congress's hands and that Congress has regularly legislated in this area for more than two centuries without prior question. The 2002 legislation is "domestic legislation that merely references territory (Jerusalem) over which a long-recognized sovereign - Israel - exercises day-to-day political control," reflecting a basic legal distinction between a sovereign's effective control over territory and formal legal recognition of that sovereignty. Zivotofsky's passport designation would acknowledge the former without affecting the latter.
In that sense, the cut-lines on the White House photos were themselves not formal legal recognition of sovereignty but simply recognition of a commonly-accepted fact about the country in which Jerusalem is located.
Master Zivotofsky, whose lawsuit was first covered by the Wall Street Journal, argues that under the 2002 law, Americans such as he have the right to choose the designation of their place of birth in their own passports, in the same fashion that American citizens born in Taiwan are given the right, pursuant to Congressional legislation, to list "Taiwan" on their passports, rather than the "People's Republic of China." Why can Congress not constitutionally legislate a similar right with respect to Jerusalem, Israel?
In an unannounced move last week, the controllers of the White House website quietly removed any link between Jerusalem and Israel. Apparently Jerusalem is now located in some other country but they don't say which one. Or perhaps it's now a country in its own right. Whatever it is, any claim to it being in Israel - far less the capital of Israel - has been removed.
This decision to expunge Israel was exposed by Rick Richman in an article in The New York Sun on August 10th (see below).
Did President Obama know about this in advance of it happening? Was this done with his approval? Is this part of his plan to put pressure on Israel to accede to his demands and hand back territory in return for nothing?
One of our colleagues received an email from Roz Rothstein of StandWithUs urging people to contact the White House to let them know how they feel and demand that they reinstate immediately the data that identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and we're please do what we can to help by spreading the word and urging people to act accordingly. It will only take a couple of minutes. The email address is www.whitehouse.gov/contact and Roz has even given her email as a guide to what to say, to help make life easier (see below). Worst case scenario, just copy it and send it.
But it is absolutely essential that we protest loud and hard about this unwarranted act of denial and that we urge all our contacts worldwide to do the same. Otherwise, it will become the 'conventional wisdom' that Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel which plays into the hands of those who seek to destroy Israel. And we don't want that, do we?
Charles Munro
Director
MIDDLE EAST EDUCATION TRUST
Please send this message (or similar) to the White House and to everyone you know. If you are active in other organizations, please share with them. Thank you in advance. Please take three minutes and let the White House know how you feel about them DENYING that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel! Here is what I wrote at e-mail at: www.whitehouse.gov/contact - under the foreign policy category. It's EASY.
DO NOT DENY THAT JERUSALEM IS AND HAS BEEN THE CAPITAL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND OF ISRAEL.
I am horrified that the White House website has scrubbed the links that locate Jerusalem in Israel.
Jerusalem has been universally recognized as the spiritual and temporal capital of the Jewish people for over 3,000 years, as documented in history and religious books and through archaeological evidence.
The Jewish people once again became the majority population in Jerusalem over 150 years ago. And when Israel reunited the city in 1967, it became the first government to protect the rights and holy sites of all faiths in Jerusalem.
DO NOT REWRITE HISTORY.
Do not hold Jerusalem hostage to current shallow political maneuvers.
Do not pretend that others have equal claim to the ancestral city of the Jewish people.
I URGE you to immediately restore the data that correctly identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
WHITE HOUSE, IN ESCALATION OF JERUSALEM CONTROVERSY,
SCRUBS ITS WEBSITE OF REFERENCES TO THE CITY BEING IN ISRAEL
The New York Sun
By, Rick Richman
August 10, 2011
The White House, in an escalation of a closely-watched case the Supreme Court is preparing to hear on whether Congress or the President gets to decide American policy in respect of passports of American citizens born in Jerusalem, has quietly altered its website to remove the references to Jerusalem being in "Israel."
The references to Jerusalem had appeared in the cut-lines of photographs on the White House website illustrating an account of the Vice President's trip to Jerusalem last year. The references to "Jerusalem, Israel' were first disclosed in The New York Sun's dispatch last week on Zivotofsky v. Clinton. The case asks the high court to rule on the constitutionality of the 2002 law that gives American citizens born in Jerusalem the right to have "Israel" entered on their passports as their place of birth.
The Sun's report was titled "Jerusalem Case at Supreme Court May Pit White House Web Site Against the President," and noted that the pictures might be pivotal evidence contradicting the administration's claim that the 2002 law impermissibly infringes the President's power to "recognize foreign sovereigns." Since the White House had effectively acknowledged on its own website that Jerusalem is in Israel - as have other executive branch agencies - the report suggested there might not really be a constitutional issue in giving Zivotofsky a statutory right to have that fact noted on his passport.
Yesterday afternoon Daniel Halper of The Weekly Standard posted one of the pictures, noting the reference to "Jerusalem, Israel" and contrasting it with the State Department press release issued earlier in the day stating the current administration policy to prohibit U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem from having "Israel" designated in their passports. The Halper posting went up at at 3:22 p.m. Less than three hours later, at 5:36 p.m. Halper noted that, at some time after he posted the picture, the White House had "apparently gone through its website, cleansing any reference to Jerusalem as being in Israel, including the pictures of Biden there last year."
Throughout the past year-and-a-half that the pictures have been on the website, no one thought the captions affected the president's constitutional powers, but rather simply noted the fact that Jerusalem is Israel's capital. It may be the subject of future final status negotiations, if final status negotiations ever resume. But currently it is within Israel, and in particular no one expects control of West Jerusalem, where Master Zivotofsky was born, ever to change.
This point is given considerable support by the amicus brief filed last Friday by Members of the U.S. Senate and House, including majority leader Sen. Harry Reid and 27 other senators from both parties, together with a bipartisan group of 11 House members, including the chair and ranking members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The amicus brief argues that the Constitution unambiguously places ultimate control over passports in Congress's hands and that Congress has regularly legislated in this area for more than two centuries without prior question. The 2002 legislation is "domestic legislation that merely references territory (Jerusalem) over which a long-recognized sovereign - Israel - exercises day-to-day political control," reflecting a basic legal distinction between a sovereign's effective control over territory and formal legal recognition of that sovereignty. Zivotofsky's passport designation would acknowledge the former without affecting the latter.
In that sense, the cut-lines on the White House photos were themselves not formal legal recognition of sovereignty but simply recognition of a commonly-accepted fact about the country in which Jerusalem is located.
Master Zivotofsky, whose lawsuit was first covered by the Wall Street Journal, argues that under the 2002 law, Americans such as he have the right to choose the designation of their place of birth in their own passports, in the same fashion that American citizens born in Taiwan are given the right, pursuant to Congressional legislation, to list "Taiwan" on their passports, rather than the "People's Republic of China." Why can Congress not constitutionally legislate a similar right with respect to Jerusalem, Israel?
No comments:
Post a Comment