Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
http://jamieglazov.com/2015/11/02/why-jews-arent-allowed-to-pray-at-the-holiest-site-in-judaism-on-the-glazov-gang/ - Video Interview w/ Daniel Greenfield
Don’t Make The Muslims Angry
Our abusive relationship with Islam has to end.
October 27, 2015
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
The
Secretary of State of the United States traveled to the Muslim country
of Jordan to assure its Foreign Minister that Jews would not be praying
any more at the holiest site in Judaism.
As Kerry put it, “It is Muslims who pray on the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and non-Muslims who visit.”
Israel
is often accused of apartheid and segregation, but here was the
Secretary of State championing both, as long as it was Muslim
segregation aimed at Jews. The Temple Mount “Status Quo” worriedly
talked about by Kerry and the media as the answer to the recent Muslim
stabbing spree is no different than the Muslim ban on Jews entering the
Cave of the Patriarchs, where Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are buried, past
the seventh step. It rewards Muslim violence by upholding Muslim
segregationist racism.
There’s
no word on whether segregated drinking fountains will be put in for
Muslims and non-Muslims. Jews visiting the former site of their Temple have been attacked for drinking from an “Islamic” water fountain.
Perhaps
the status quo will also say that, “It is Muslims who drink from water
fountains on the Temple Mount and non-Muslims who go thirsty.”
And don’t even ask about the bathrooms. PLO leader Abbas, whom Kerry also met with, shrieked that Jews“have no right to defile it with their filthy feet”.
The
status quo on the Temple Mount and in the Middle East is the
supremacism of Muslim bigotry. The Jews violated this status quo in a
very big way by seeking independence. The indigenous Jewish people were
no longer willing to be a conquered nation under the boot of Muslim
invaders, forced to live in ghettos, wear yellow badges, walk barefoot or wait on the seventh step outside their holy places.
Every
act of Muslim terrorism is blamed on this primal Jewish violation of
the “Status Quo”. Israel violated the status quo by becoming the first
non-Muslim country in the Middle East. If that wasn’t bad enough, Jews
violated the status quo even further by becoming the first indigenous
people to reclaim land lost in a war from its Muslim conquerors. Then
the members of a religion that had been defeated by Islam, its holy
places turned into mosques, had the temerity to go and pray at their own
holy places.
What
could Muslims do in the face of so many violations of the status quo by
an inferior conquered race except resort to maddened orgies of
violence, setting off bombs and chopping up Rabbis with cleavers?
It’s
not only the Jews who get in trouble for violating the Muslim status
quo. When Coptic Christians turned out to protest the Muslim Brotherhood
regime in Egypt, the supporters of the “moderate” terror group, which
Kerry backs, responded by shouting “Death to the Christians” and burning
churches.
Jordan’s
Foreign Minister warned Kerry, “When you infuriate the emotions of one
of our billion Muslims around the world, things become rather thorny and
rather difficult to manage.”
The
world’s one billion Muslims, whose delicate emotions are always
infuriated by something, enforce an Islamic status quo in which no
non-Muslim dares to violate the Muslim superiority complex.
A Danish newspaper can’t print cartoons that a few Imams don’t like or the billion Muslims will get angry. Burger King can’t have ice cream that
Muslims think resembles the name of their god or a billion Muslims will
get angry. America can’t defend itself against Islamic terrorism or a
billion Muslims will get angry. Jews in Israel and Christians in Egypt
can’t have their civil rights or a billion Muslims will get angry.
Some
might say that the billion Muslims are just looking for things to get
angry at… but that would just make a billion Muslims angry.
When
buildings fall or buses blow up, when people are stabbed, shot or
exploded by the unofficial representatives of the bilious billion, we go
right past the crime to the anger that motivated it. “Why do they hate
us?” becomes the question and Muslim anger becomes the pivot of national
security policy.
Since
Muslim anger causes violence, we stop terrorism by tiptoeing around
anything that might make them angry. Minor things mostly like freedom of
speech or freedom of religion. If you’re a Coptic Christian who makes a
YouTube video about Mohammed, you can be sent to prison when some of
the moderate Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda locals murder four Americans
while shouting, “Allahu Akbar.”
After
weeks of brutal Muslim murders, Kerry has gotten Israel to reinforce a
ban on Jews praying at the holiest site in Judaism because it offends
Muslims. Next up, maybe Jews will be restricted to the seventh step of
the Cave of the Patriarchs again. Because that was the “Status Quo”
under the Muslim conquest.
But
the status quo won’t be restored by merely banning Jews from praying at
the Temple Mount. It won’t even be restored by giving in to demands
from Obama, Kerry and the outraged stabber lobby to keep Jews out of
those parts of Jerusalem that Muslims had ethnically cleansed them from
in 1948.
A
Jewish Israel is a violation of the Islamic status quo. But so are a
Christian Spain and an independent Greece. The Ottoman Empire at its
peak nearly reached Vienna and extended into the Ukraine. Muslims once
held Sicily. The monstrous Mughals ruled over much of India. Creative
Muslim geography and revisionist history now claim that Australia’s
aborigines were originally Muslim and Turkey’s Islamist ruler, who hopes
to revive the Ottoman Empire, insists that Muslims originally
discovered America.
These violations of the status quo must all be eliminated or a billion Muslims will be very, very angry.
Pandering
to Muslim bigotry only earns more of the same. The Muslims butchering
Jews in Jerusalem are not going to be satisfied with any status quo
short of the total Sharia subjugation of the Jews with all the attendant
ritual humiliations of ghettos, bare feet and legal immunity for Muslim
murderers of Jews.
Allowing
Muslims to set the tone for every negotiation by invoking one billion
fuming faithful who will go on a killing spree if a cartoon is
published, a book is printed or a prayer is prayed is a submission to a
racist theocracy. Worse still, it treats the anger of the bigoted
murderers as if it had moral weight.
Our
diplomatic Stockholm syndrome traces back the root cause of Muslim
violence not to the Muslim killers, but to anyone who might be guilty of
provoking them.
Obama’s
people responded to the murder of Americans in Benghazi with a
Pakistani video apology and by treating a YouTube video critical of
Mohammed as the real crime. Hillary Clinton told the father of a murderedSEAL, “We're going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”
When Muslims butcher Jews in Jerusalem, the blame settles not on the killers, but on their victims.
Some
Jews had to be stabbed because other Jews (and their filthy feet) had
prayed at the holiest site in Judaism that the Muslim conquerors claimed
for their own because Mohammed once flew there on a magic horse with a
woman’s head. Or at least that was this week’s Muslim excuse for killing
Jews.
Muslims
had been killing Jews for over a thousand years. But there’s always
some momentary excuse for how the Jewish victims provoked their Muslim
killers this time that utterly fails to explain why this same cycle of
Muslim anti-Semitic violence has been going on since the beginning of
Islam.
We
are often lectured on how oppressed Muslims are. One of the more
popular Muslim victimization memes claims that Muslims are “the new
Jews”. So far the only thing they have done to prove this claim is
trying to kill all the Jews on the theory that when all the Jews are
dead, they can be the new Jews.
By
accepting Muslim anger as moral we have turned murderers into victims
and victims into murderers. The extremes of Muslim outrage are not proof
of their suffering, their frustration and desperation, as the media
claims, but of their racism, their supremacism and their dehumanization
of non-Muslims.
Muslim terrorism is not a cry for help. It’s a cry of hate.
Muslims
are not entitled to a supremacist status quo that enshrines their
conquests as sacred and forever represses the rights and identities of
the peoples under their rule. It is this supremacist sense of
entitlement that fuels Muslim terror from ISIS to Hamas.
Upholding
such a status quo only breeds further conflicts as Islam seeks to
restore its status quo conquests around the world. It’s their belief
that they can restore a supremacist status quo that is the cause of
Muslim terrorism. Take away this expectation of a status quo and Muslim
terror goes away.
Obama
has decided to uphold the Muslim status quo. Muslim terrorism is met
with backdoor support for a Caliphate through political Islam. Muslim
stabbings in Israel are met with calls for upholding a Muslim
supremacist status quo that bans Jews from praying at the holiest site
in their religion.
Our
national security strategy, our diplomacy and the premise of societies
that are being transformed by Muslim migration is don’t make the Muslims
angry. This vision for the West is an abusive relationship in which the
free world plays the beaten wife whose dreams and hopes have narrowed
down to not “provoking” another violent tantrum from the psychotic
monster who has taken over her life.
“Don’t
Make the Muslims Angry” has become our highest law. The free world
needs an intervention before we give up our rights, our identities and
our future to live in this abusive relationship with Islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment