For those of you who are still not
familiar with the Muslim Brotherhood Explanatory Memorandum: On the
General Strategic Goal for the Group in North
America please read here.
Their objective in their own
words:
“The process of settlement
is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the
word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must
understand that their work in America is a kind of
grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western
civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable
house by their hands and the hands of the believers
so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made
victorious over all other religions.”
CAIR
Representative in Austin Texas: “If we are practicing
Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”
Allen West link
http://www.allenbwest.com/2016/01/what-cair-just-said-should-make-everyone-islamophobic/
It was
initially reported by the US
World Report
What CAIR Just Said Should Make Everyone Islamophobic
Written
by The Analytical Economist
on January 5,
2016
By: Allen West
We’ve often
pointed out that the Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) is not the warm and fuzzy group they’d have you
believe. After all, CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in
the largest terror funding case in our history — The Holy
Land Foundation — and was listed in the Muslim Brotherhood’s
own Explanatory Memorandum as one of its American arms. (And
by the way, if you haven’t yet downloaded
this document, the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan for
“civilizational jihad” here in the U.S., you
really must, especially after what you’re going to read
next).
Just recently CAIR partially
blamed the San Bernardino massacre on
America, and came to the aid of the
families of the shooters. But not the
victims.
Apparently in the world of CAIR, the
right to practice religion freely means the right to impose
it on others – as reported by US World
report:
The Director of the Dallas Council on
American- Islamic Relations (CAIR), Mustafa Carroll, made
a surprising and shocking statement during a Muslim rally
in Austin, Texas. He said,
“If we are practicing Muslims, we
are above the law of the land.”
Such a statement captures the Trojan
horse that is CAIR. While they sell themselves simply as a
Muslim advocacy group (similar to the ACLU, but exclusively
for Muslims), that couldn’t be further from the truth.
They cry “Islamophobia” at the drop of
the pen, but there’s good reason to be CAIR-phobic:
In 2014, the United Arab Emirates
placed CAIR, along with 81 other groups, on its list of
terrorist organizations. Some believe the action was to
done to show a stand against the Terrorist Organization,
the Muslim Brotherhood, who seized power in Egypt during
the Arab Spring. It should be noted that members of the
Obama Administration openly endorsed the events in Egypt
that led to the Muslim Brotherhood taking power, likening
it to the Civil Rights Movement in America. It has been
suspected that CAIR has had ties with the Muslim
Brotherhood, and currently, the Obama administration is
working to get CAIR removed from the list of terrorist
groups.
Need more evidence that CAIR should be
designated a terrorist organization? Not only have two CAIR
officials been indicted on terrorism charges:
In 2011 and 2012, during an event that
The Blaze covered extensively, Islamic institutes
coordinated with the White House to target the counter
terrorism training within the FBI. The event was called ‘The Purge,’
and the result was the removal of more than 700 documents
and 300 presentations. Some of the presentations removed
included information about Al Qaeda and the trainers
within the FBI were allegedly not given the opportunity to
appeal when their presentations were rejected. They were
not even allowed to know who it was that was objecting to
their work. CAIR was one of the institutes that pushed for
this event.
The socialist presidential candidate
Norman Thomas once stated that Americans would unknowingly
adopt socialism under the name of liberalism. CAIR wants us
to unknowingly adopt Sharia under the name of tolerance.
[Note: This post was authored by The
Analytical Economist]
House Democrats Turn
to the Wrong Muslims for SOTU
by IPT News • Jan 11,
2016
The gesture might not
generate much more than a shrug, except that in at least two
cases, Democrats invited officials from a group the FBI formally avoids due to historic ties
to a Hamas support network. Delray Beach Rep. Alcee Hastings
invited Nezar Hamze, regional operations
director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) in Florida. And San Jose, Cal. Rep. Zoe Lofgren
invited Sameena Usman, a 10-year veteran
government relations official with CAIR's San Francisco
chapter, the Investigative Project on Terrorism has learned.
CAIR officials routinely accuse federal law enforcement of entrapping otherwise innocent and
peaceful Muslims in order to gin up terrorism prosecutions.
Hamze's colleagues in CAIR-Florida are helping a family sue the FBI over the 2013 fatal
shooting of a terror suspect who attacked agents after
extensive questioning.
Usman's office published a notorious poster urging
Muslims to "Build a Wall of Resistance [and] Don't Talk to
the FBI." For its part, the FBI cut off contact with CAIR,
except in investigations, in 2008 based on evidence its
agents uncovered which placed CAIR in a Hamas-support
network in the United States. Until it can be shown that
those connections no longer exist, an FBI official explained in 2009, CAIR is not "an
appropriate liaison partner."
In addition, several CAIR
officials have compared Israel to ISIS.
Calls to press contacts in
Lofgren and Hastings' offices were not returned Monday.
Last month, the IPT provided
exclusive details from eyewitness
accounts about CAIR's creation, including an account of how
a co-founder sought approval from the Egyptian Muslim
Brotherhood for CAIR's bylaws, and how Executive Director
Nihad Awad's move to Washington was "in order to represent
Hamas."
Hastings and Lofgren either
failed to check out their guests' employer or they don't
care. These connections have nothing to do with the faith of
CAIR officials. But the organization has a record that
elected officials stubbornly insist should be ignored.
Unfortunately, this is part
of a pattern of outreach House Democrats seek out with the
wrong people. Last month, CAIR-Florida's Hassan Shibly was invited to the White House for a
discussion about religious discrimination. Then, as with the
State of the Union speech, no one from the new Muslim Reform
Movement – which issued a declaration clearly rejecting
"interpretations of Islam that call for any violence, social
injustice and politicized Islam" and standing for "peace,
human rights and secular governance."
In 2012, House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi sat with Awad, the only executive
director in the organization's history, at a fundraiser for
the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
A seat in the House chamber
for the State of the Union bestows undeserved clout to the
CAIR officials. And, in trying to show the public that
American Muslims are not a monolithic group of radicalized
Islamists, Hastings and Lofgren are doing their cause more
harm than good.
No comments:
Post a Comment