Yoram
will be in the
US during
May, 2016,
available for
speaking
engagements (http://bit.ly/1W5CrSr).
Video:
The
precariousness
of Israel’s
narrow
waistline
Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger, “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
Part seven in a 6 minute YouTube video series on US-Israel and the Mideast*
Part 7: http://bit.ly/1YDNIdJ; the entire series: http://bit.ly/1ze66dS
Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger, “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
Part seven in a 6 minute YouTube video series on US-Israel and the Mideast*
Part 7: http://bit.ly/1YDNIdJ; the entire series: http://bit.ly/1ze66dS
1.
Pressuring
Israel to
retreat to the
pre-1967
ceasefire
lines – which
is an
8-15-mile
sliver along
the
Mediterranean,
dominated by
the Judea
& Samaria
mountain ridge
– ignores
Jewish history
and represents
a victory of
wishful-thinking
over the
1,400-year-old
reality of
Mideast
violence,
unpredictability,
doublespeak,
tyranny and
hate-education.
2.
Mideast peace
agreements are
as durable as
are Arab
regimes,
policies and
accords, which
have been,
since the 7th
century, the
world’s most
shifty,
intolerant,
violent,
volatile and
treacherous,
as currently
reflected by
the
intensifying
Arab Tsunami
from
northwestern
Africa to the
Persian Gulf.
3.
“Land for
Peace” assumes
that an
Israeli
withdrawal
from Judea
& Samaria
would convince
Arabs to
accord the
“infidel” Jew
that which
Muslim
“believers”
have denied
one another
for 1,400
years:
peaceful
coexistence
and compliance
with
agreements.
4.
“Land for
Peace” would
usher the Arab
Tsunami into
the mountain
ridges of
Judea &
Samaria, which
tower over 80%
of Israel’s
population and
infrastructures,
including
Jerusalem, Tel
Aviv and
Israel’s only
international
airport. It
also towers
over the
Jordan Valley,
Israel’s
longest
border.
5.
“Land for
Peace” would
doom Jerusalem
to be an
enclave
connected to
the coastal
plain through
a 4-mile-wide
corridor,
which would be
dominated by
mountains
under Arab
sovereignty.
6.
The width of
pre-1967
Israel (8-15
miles) is
equal to the
length of DFW
airport in
Texas, the
distance
between JFK
and La Guardia
airports in
NY, Kennedy
Center and RFK
Stadium in
Washington,
DC. The area
of pre-1967
Israel (0.2%
of the Arab
World) is
smaller than
the gunnery
range at
Nellis Air
Force Base,
Nevada.
7.
Former
Chairman of
the US Joint
C-o-S, the
late General
Earl Wheeler
told President
Lyndon
Johnson: “The
minimum
requirements
for Israel's
defense
include most
of the West
Bank, the
whole of Gaza
and the Golan
Heights.”
100 retired
US Generals
and Admirals
cautioned
Israel against
withdrawing
from Judea
& Samaria,
stating that
is would be
impossible to
demilitarize
the area
effectively.
The late
Admiral Bud
Nance:” The
eastern
mountain ridge
of the West
Bank is one of
the world's
best tank
barriers…. The
western
mountain ridge
of the West
Bank
constitutes a
dream platform
of invasion to
Israel's
narrow [8-15
miles] coastal
plain. Control
of the West
Bank provides
Israel the
time [50
hours] to
mobilize
reservists
[75% of
Israel’s
military],
which are
critical to
Israel’s
survival
during a
surprise Arab
attack.” Most
reservists
reside in the
Jerusalem-Tel
Aviv-Haifa
area, which is
dominated by
the Judea
& Samaria
mountain
ridge.
8.
Contrary to
conventional
“wisdom,”
ground
barriers are
significant in
the era of
ballistic
missiles.
According to
the US Army
Institute of
Land Warfare:
"Land force is
the
cornerstone of
deterrence....
Ground units
can both
destroy and
occupy....
During the
Afghan
campaign of
2002,
precision air
strikes were
critical, but
they neither
annihilated
opposition nor
finished the
enemy....”
According to
General Al
Gray, former
Commandant, US
Marine Corps,
“Military
success
requires more
than a few
hundred
missiles. To
defeat Israel
would require
the Arabs to
deploy armor,
infantry and
artillery into
Israel and
destroy the
IDF on the
ground.”
9.
Military high
tech today
will be low
tech tomorrow,
but high
ground always
remains high
ground.
Moreover, any
technology can
be jammed, but
one cannot jam
the
mountainous
topography of
Judea &
Samaria.
10.
Should the
Sinai
concession (to
Egypt) apply
to Judea &
Samaria? The
Sinai borders
the Negev,
which is
topographically
similar to the
Sinai,
sparsely
populated, a
platform for
much of
Israel’s
standing army.
On the other
hand, Judea
& Samaria
borders the
topographically
inferior,
densely
populated,
most
vulnerable
8-15 mile
sliver along
the
Mediterranean.
50 hours are
required to
violate
Sinai’s
demilitarization
(22,000 sq
mi), but only
10 hours in
Judea &
Samaria (2,200
sq mi).
11.
The withdrawal
from the Sinai
Peninsula was
a calculated
risk; a
withdrawal
from the
mountain
ridges of
Judea &
Samaria would
be a lethal
gamble.
12.
The geographic
depth of
J&S, the
Golan Heights
and the Sinai
enabled Israel
to survive the
1973 surprise
Arab
offensive.
13.
A withdrawal
from the
mountain
ridges of
Judea &
Samaria would
reward endemic
aggressors and
serial
violators of
agreements,
and punish the
intended
victim. It
would fuel
belligerence,
undermine
stability and
the pursuit of
peace. It
would demolish
Israel’s
posture of
deterrence,
which is an
irreplaceable
life insurance
policy in the
most violent
region in the
world, which
has never
tolerated
“infidel”
entities.
No comments:
Post a Comment