frontpagemag.com, October
17, 2014
Last week
Thomas Friedman
tried to understand ISIS
through the lens of Batman. This week
he’s back and valiantly struggling
to see ISIS in any terms other than
Islamic.
So what
has the Great Flattener come up with?
I was intrigued by
this story because it highlighted
the degree to which ISIS operates
just like an “invasive species” in
the world of plants and animals. It
is not native to either the Iraqi or
Syrian ecosystems. It never before
grew in their landscapes.
I find it useful at
times to use the natural world to
illuminate trends in geopolitics and
globalization, and this is one of
them…
I can’t think of a
better way to understand ISIS. It is
a coalition.
I can’t think of a
better way to understand Thomas
Friedman except brain damage. He
thinks that the best possible way to
understand an Islamic terrorist group
is not through Islam but through
ecology.
There are a couple of
problems with Friedman’s analogy
1. ISIS is native to
Iraq/Syria/Jordan. Its current Caliph
is an Iraqi with a degree from the U
of Baghdad.
2. There is a history
of similar groups going back centuries
including the Ikhwan’s attacks on a
lot of the same places. Even the
Takfiri term which Friedman fastens on
to explain ISIS’s invasiveness is used
precisely because it has an extensive
local history.
3. If ISIS were an
invasive species it would be
displacing local Islam in which case
there would be an internal religious
war. There isn’t.
4. Thomas Friedman is
a wellspring of ignorance that never
stops flowing.
They spread so far,
so fast, despite their relatively
small numbers, because the disturbed
Iraqi and Syrian societies enabled
these foreign jihadists to forge
alliances with secular, native-born,
Iraqi and Syrian Sunni tribesmen and
former Baathist army officers, whose
grievances were less religious and
more about how Iraq and Syria were
governed.
If you can follow
Friedman’s serious case of brain
damage/article, then he is arguing
that the Iraqis who are part of ISIS
are secular while the Jihadis are
foreign Muslims. There’s no reason for
Friedman to claim this except that it
keeps his metaphor on life support.
Generally speaking,
though, over the years in Iraq and
Afghanistan we have overspent on
herbicides (guns and training) and
underinvested in the best bulwark
against invasive species
(noncorrupt, just governance). We
should be pressing the Iraqi
government, which is rich with cash,
to focus on delivering to every
Iraqi still under its control 24
hours of electricity a day, a job,
better schools, more personal
security and a sense that no matter
what sect they’re from the game is
not rigged against them and their
voice will count. That is how you
strengthen an ecosystem against
invasive species.
That’s right. The only
thing that will stop ISIS is better
schools. They would have to be better
than Oxford which doesn’t seem to have
helped Friedman any.
I look forward to
Friedman’s next column comparing ISIS
to hot air balloons or a species of
poodle or a sesame seed bagel.
The best way to
understand Thomas Friedman may be
through Lord Palmerston’s comment
describing Napoleon III as a
“meddlesome mediocrity… in whose brain
foolish ideas multiply like rabbits.”
Daniel Greenfield, a
Shillman Journalism Fellow at the
Freedom Center, is a New York writer
focusing on radical Islam. He is
completing a book on the
international challenges America
faces in the 21st century.
Dan Friedman
NYC
No comments:
Post a Comment